They improve lead quality by unifying first‑party data (CRM activity, website behaviour, portal enquiries, call notes) to model intent and prioritise follow‑ups. Custom models detect micro‑segments and journey triggers that generic tools miss. Beyond scoring, robust setups include entity resolution, propensity and churn modelling, retrieval‑augmented responses for context‑aware messaging, and channel orchestration aligned with consent preferences. You also gain uplift testing, privacy‑by‑design workflows, and lookalike audiences built on compliant signals. Done well, negotiators spend more time with prospects showing genuine move intent, not noise.
Centralise a clean, versioned property and transaction layer, then expose a governed feature store for valuation models. Blend public transaction records, building/energy certificates, neighbourhood indices, and your instruction outcomes to cover both comparables and demand signals. Use model cards, reason codes (e.g., SHAP), and human‑in‑the‑loop review so valuers can justify outputs against professional valuation standards. Maintain data lineage, access controls, and audit trails, and capture human overrides to improve calibration over time. Lightweight AVMs paired with expert sign‑off typically provide confidence and speed.
A focused 30‑day pilot often completes in 2–6 weeks and costs roughly €15k–€60k, depending on scope and data readiness. Typical phases: discovery and KPI definition; secure data ingest from CRM/portals; a baseline model or prompt‑flow; a minimal UI or CRM plug‑in; and basic MLOps (monitoring, drift alerts). Success metrics usually include conversion uplift, faster days‑to‑list, reduced cost per valuation, or improved pipeline accuracy. Expect modest cloud/runtime spend and optional human labelling. After the pilot, budget for hardening (RBAC, audit logs), retraining cadence, and ROI thresholds before scaling.
Focus on lawful data use, transparency, and consent for electronic communications; advertising standards for claims and disclosures; professional valuation standards; and consumer protection rules for fair, non‑misleading information. Apply data minimisation, security controls, and explainability to support contestability. Maintain records of decisions, model changes, and data provenance, and ensure vendor due diligence for any processors. Cookie management, clear opt‑outs, and robust access controls help reduce risk while preserving marketing effectiveness. Align internal policies with your risk appetite and audit requirements before launch.
Yes, once you have sufficient, high‑quality first‑party data, bespoke models usually beat generic tools on accuracy and relevance. Custom builds capture hyper‑local price dynamics, listing‑copy nuances, negotiator behaviour, seasonality by branch, and your specific funnel patterns. They can be tuned for fairness, emit reason codes for trust, and integrate natively with CRM workflows. Off‑the‑shelf tools are fine as early baselines but often plateau and lack explainability or fit. Evaluate data volume, governance effort, and lifecycle costs before committing.
Move when the workflow is proven, volumes or risk increase, or clients expect reliability and auditability. Clear triggers include the need for SLAs and low latency, role‑based access, data contracts, versioned features/models, observability (drift, bias, cost), and repeatable retraining. If analysts are manually tweaking prompts or spreadsheets weekly, it’s time for proper MLOps and CI/CD. Migrate incrementally: stabilise data first, then containerise services, then introduce governance and cost controls. This reduces disruption while improving robustness.