WislaCode

How to leverage artificial intelligence for fintech business growth?

How to leverage artificial intelligence for fintech business growth
Article navigation
Publication date: 19.02.2026
AI is no longer a “lab project”. In financial services, it can improve conversion, reduce cost-to-serve, accelerate decision-making, and strengthen risk controls. The challenge is that many AI initiatives fail to reach production value because teams start with tools, not outcomes, and underestimate data, governance, and integration effort. This guide reframes AI as a growth system: measurable outcomes, a prioritised portfolio of use cases, and a delivery approach that your security, compliance, and engineering teams can support. Requirements vary by region and regulator, so involve compliance and legal early and validate security requirements with your infosec team.

What breaks most AI-for-growth programmes?

Across discovery workshops, MVPs, and pilots, the same issues keep appearing:
  • “AI everywhere” scope: too many use cases, unclear success metrics, and no path to adoption.
  • Data reality gap: missing labels, inconsistent identifiers, poor lineage, or unclear PII handling.
  • Vendor mismatch: strong data science, weak software engineering and MLOps, or vice versa.
  • Governance late to the party: model risk, auditability, and access control become blockers after build.
  • Integration friction: models are built, but not wired into real workflows (core banking, CRM, contact centre).
“AI creates growth only when it changes decisions or actions in the real product. A model without workflow integration is a report.”
AI-driven development

WislaCode software makes your employees' daily work faster and more intuitive, allowing teams to complete tasks faster and business owners to save time and resources.

Start with outcomes: the growth value map

Before you choose models or vendors, define where growth will come from. For banks and fintechs, the most practical outcome buckets are:

  1. Acquire and convert: Examples: smarter onboarding, document triage, personalised offers, next-best-action prompts.
  2. Retain and expand: Examples: churn prediction, proactive support, personalised financial insights, engagement nudges.
  3. Reduce cost-to-serve: Examples: AI-assisted customer support, internal copilots for ops and engineering, automated QA triage.
  4. Reduce risk and losses: Examples: fraud detection, transaction monitoring support, underwriting decision support.

For each bucket, write down:

  • Target metric (conversion rate, handling time, approval time, fraud loss rate)
  • Owner (product, risk, ops) and who signs off
  • Decision point in the workflow the AI will influence

This keeps your AI programme tied to business growth, not novelty.

Choose the right AI pattern for the job

For growth use cases, three patterns cover most needs:

1) Predictive ML (classification, scoring, forecasting)

Best when you have structured data and a clear target: approval probability, churn risk, fraud likelihood.

Strength: measurable performance and stable evaluation.

Trade-off: needs data readiness, labels, and ongoing monitoring for drift.

2) GenAI for knowledge and content (RAG, summarisation, drafting)

Best for support and operations: answering policy questions, summarising customer history, drafting responses.

Strength: fast time-to-value when connected to internal knowledge bases.

Trade-off: requires guardrails (hallucination risk, prompt injection, data leakage controls).

3) Hybrid decision systems (rules + ML + human-in-the-loop)

Best for regulated decisions: underwriting, AML support, high-impact actions.

Strength: combines automation with control, auditability, and operational safety.

Trade-off: more design work: escalation paths, override rules, and audit logs.

Few successful projects of WislaCode
Building a Roadmap for Action
Exploring the State and Future of AI Testing
Outcome for business
Intelligent platform for carsharing

Build vs buy, and delivery models that work

Build vs buy (and the hidden cost drivers)

  • Buy (platform or vendor product) works when the use case is standard, integration is straightforward, and governance artefacts are available for due diligence.
  • Build (custom) is justified when your data, workflows, and differentiation matter, or when you need tighter control over security, explainability, and runtime behaviour.

Cost and timeline depend on: data access approvals, number of integrations, required auditability, model monitoring needs, and rollout complexity. Avoid assuming “buy is always cheaper” if integration and change management are large.

In-house vs agency vs dedicated team

  • In-house: strongest control and domain learning, but slower hiring and skill coverage gaps can increase cost.
  • Agency: good for a time-boxed discovery or pilot, but continuity may suffer.
  • Dedicated team: best when you want sustained delivery with stable velocity and clearer ownership.

From AI discovery to production growth

1) Requirements and success metrics (make “value” testable)

Define:

  • A small set of Tier-1 user journeys the AI will impact
  • Acceptance criteria beyond model accuracy: latency, fallbacks, explainability expectations, and what happens when confidence is low
  • A measurement plan: A/B testing where feasible, or controlled rollouts with leading indicators

2) Architecture and integration plan (AI must live inside your product)

A cost-efficient architecture usually includes:

  • Data pipelines with clear lineage (what data, from where, who can access it)
  • Inference service exposed via internal APIs (online for real-time, batch for nightly scoring)
  • Event tracking to measure outcomes and model behaviour
  • Integration points: core banking, CRM, contact centre, KYC providers, open banking APIs

Decide early whether you need real-time decisions, batch updates, or both.

3) Security and compliance checklist (reduce rework and approval delays)

Include these in your delivery plan and contract/SOW:

  • Threat modelling for AI-specific risks (data leakage, prompt injection, insecure plugins)
  • OWASP-aligned secure SDLC for the full stack, not just the model
  • IAM and least-privilege access to datasets and environments
  • Encryption in transit and at rest, plus key management approach
  • Data residency, retention, and deletion rules (varies by region/regulator)
  • Audit logging for sensitive actions and model-influenced decisions
  • Vendor due diligence pack: SDLC, incident response, access model, subcontractors, and third-party model usage terms

Do not treat compliance as a guarantee. Validate requirements with legal/compliance and your infosec team.

4) Delivery process (ship safely, then scale)

A pragmatic cadence:

  • Discovery (2–4 weeks): value map, data audit, risk review, solution architecture, MVP backlog
  • MVP (6–12 weeks, depends): build one end-to-end flow into production-like staging with monitoring
  • Pilot rollout: limited cohort, human-in-the-loop controls, feedback loops
  • Scale: automate evaluation, add monitoring and drift detection, harden reliability (SLOs, runbooks)

Common mistakes and how to avoid them?

  • Starting with a chatbot without clear workflow ownership: anchor GenAI in support or ops processes with measurable targets.
  • Ignoring data quality: do a data audit before committing to timelines.
  • No guardrails for GenAI: implement RAG, allow-list sources, and logging; test for prompt injection.
  • Pilot that cannot scale: design deployment, monitoring, and access controls from day one.
  • Over-automation in regulated decisions: use hybrid systems and human review where needed.
  • Vendor black box: require documentation, evaluation results, and clear operational responsibilities.

AI can drive business growth in financial services when it is treated as a product capability, not a standalone experiment. The most cost-effective path is a focused use case, strong data foundations, and production-grade delivery with security and governance built in.

If you need a partner to scope, build, and integrate AI capabilities into fintech products with an engineering-first approach and regulated-industry discipline, WislaCode can support discovery through production across web, mobile, and full-stack delivery.

Share:
About the Author

Viacheslav Kostin is the CEO of WislaCode. Former C-level banker with 20+ years in fintech, digital strategy and IT. He led transformation at major banks across Europe and Asia, building super apps, launching online lending, and scaling mobile platforms to millions of users.
Executive MBA from IMD Business School (Switzerland). Now helps banks and lenders go fully digital - faster, safer, smarter.

Scroll to Top